Woman gets called “selfish” and “terrible” for expressing relief that she’s not expected to help a friend with kids “because the village doesn’t exist anymore”

Friendships can be tested to their limits when differing life choices intersect in uncomfortable ways. A balance must be struck between empathy and one’s personal boundaries, especially when the issue at hand revolves around parenting and the expectations surrounding it.

A woman on Reddit found herself in this exact predicament when she expressed her relief at not being expected to help a friend with kids “because the village doesn’t exist anymore”, only to be labeled as “selfish” and “terrible”. In her post, she shared her honest thoughts on the romanticized notion of “the village” and how it can sometimes be a euphemism for unpaid women’s labour.

Woman Sparks Controversy Over Rejecting “Village” Parenting Expectations

The Reddit user, who goes by the anonymous handle, detailed her confrontation with her friend “Bella”. Bella, a mother of two, often lamented the loss of “the village”, a social structure where communities would pitch in to help raise children. Bella’s definition of “the village”, however, seemed to revolve around free babysitting and household help, a notion that raised the Reddit user’s ire.

According to the Reddit user, she had been listening to Bella’s complaints for years. Bella felt frustrated that she couldn’t travel or enjoy her life because she lacked the support of a “village”. The final straw came when Bella expressed envy over the Reddit user’s recent overseas holiday. The user finally voiced her opinion on the matter, stating that she was glad “the village” was a thing of the past.

In her post, she wrote: “I’m actually really glad we have moved away from that because “the village” that parents romanticise was actually the unpaid labor of women, and as a woman who doesn’t want a child, I’m glad that I’m no longer considered socially obligated to babysit other people’s kids for free.”

Her comments triggered a strong response from Bella who accused her of being selfish and a bad feminist. Bella hasn’t spoken to her since.

The post sparked heated discussions in the Reddit community. One comment read: “So many things from caring for the sick/disabled, community projects, to helping raise children was unpaid women’s labour’s that relied on us not being able to work. Yes, it’s unfair now that women are expected to work and raise children unless the men are doing an equal share. But in this case it just sounds like your friend wasn’t ready for the responsibility of a child.”

Another Redditor chimed in, offering a broader perspective on the concept of “the village”, suggesting that it was not just about childcare but also about community support in times of crisis. They wrote: “The village means that when someone has a baby, or surgery, or suffers a loss, the whole neighborhood makes meals. It means that when my son has issues with school my dad can intercede. It doesn’t mean I can just dump my kids on my parents or in-laws and go party.”

Unpacking the Concept of the “Village” and its Implications

At the heart of this debate lies a question that has been bouncing around parenting forums, social media, and casual conversations for years: What does it mean to raise a child in a “village”?

In its idealized form, the “village” is a support network comprising family, friends, and neighbors. It’s often romanticized as a communal haven of mutual help and support, where childrearing responsibilities are shared, and everyone contributes according to their abilities.

However, as the Reddit user bluntly pointed out, this notion can sometimes mask an expectation of unpaid labor, particularly from women. Her assertion—which resonated with many—is that the “village”, as Bella envisaged it, was a return to a time when women were expected to shoulder domestic and childrearing tasks without compensation or acknowledgment.

While it’s undeniable that many parents yearn for more support—especially in societies where extended family networks are eroding—the Reddit user’s perspective challenges us to consider whether this nostalgia for the “village” inadvertently perpetuates gender inequities.

On the other hand, other Redditors pointed out that the concept of the “village” isn’t solely about free babysitting. It’s about reciprocity and interdependence—offering help when you can, and accepting it when you need it. In this sense, the “village” could be seen as a counterpoint to hyper-individualistic societies where everyone is expected to fend for themselves.

The debate raises important questions about what kind of society we want to build and how we can balance individual autonomy with collective responsibility. The discussion also underscores the importance of ensuring that calls for community support do not inadvertently reinforce traditional gender roles or exploit unpaid labor.

A Call for More Nuanced Conversations Around Parenting and Community

This heated exchange on Reddit offers a microcosm of the broader societal debates about parenting, community, and gender roles. It’s a reminder that seemingly personal issues—like how to raise children and who should help—are deeply entwined with larger societal structures and norms.

While it’s understandable for parents to yearn for more support, it’s crucial to ensure these conversations do not inadvertently perpetuate unfair expectations or exploit unpaid labor. This isn’t about shaming individual parents or dismissing the hardships they face. Rather, it’s about acknowledging that these personal struggles are part of larger systemic issues.

The reality is that parenting, in its current form, is often an overwhelming task. It’s perhaps no surprise then that many parents feel nostalgic for a romanticized past where burdens were shared more equitably among a larger group.

However, as we strive towards building more supportive communities, it’s important to remember that the idealized “village” of the past had its own problems—including gender inequities and the exploitation of unpaid labor. As we reimagine what community support could look like in the future, we must ensure it is truly equitable and doesn’t simply shift burdens onto others.

Perhaps instead of harking back to an imagined past, we could use this as an opportunity to create something new—a “village” defined not by obligation and unpaid labor, but by genuine reciprocity, equity, and mutual support. It’s a challenging task, no doubt, but one that could lead to healthier and more supportive communities for everyone.